Plays Review: Heartbreak House; Waiting for Godot; The Caretaker; Pygmalion


 Note: I read these plays from the English Literature syllabus for CSS exams as per my preparation for the exams.

 

201- Heartbreak House by G.B. Shaw

I heard about Shaw when I came across a quotation of his, which much like himself, was unconventionally contradictory. It said: ‘The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all the progress depends on the unreasonable man.’ Now, I am usually a champion of the noble and self-sacrificing idea of compromising oneself to the demands of the world, since the world would never do so. But Shaw’s striking boldness in putting the stake of progress on those who do not reason with the world was something I wasn’t ready to hear. Nonetheless, I became curious about Shaw and my curiosity was soon answered by the English Literature syllabus for the competitive exams that we have here. ‘Heartbreak House’, I had read in one article about Shaw, was one of the best plays by him, and after reading it with a thrilling excitement and energy in a week, I was convinced by the article’s claim. I hadn’t read any Plays before; therefore I wasn’t only reading Shaw for the first time, but also a play. And luckily Shaw’s ‘Heartbreak House’ made me fall in love with the genre. Plays are made of dialogues, with few descriptive details about the set provided in-between for the theatre adaptation or for reader’s help to visualize; they also come in ‘Acts’, which is similar to Parts in novels; characters are numbered here and are usually listed at the beginning of the play; each play is also of a certain genre: comedy, tragedy, romance, fantasia, tragicomedy, and so on. ‘Heartbreak House’ is subtitled as ‘a Fantasia in Russian manner about the English themes’, which explains its influence from the Russian playwright and short-stories writer Anton Chekhov. In this play, which takes place in a ship-like house during the course of one evening, we have the owner Captain Shotover and his daughters Hesione, who lives in this house, and her Lady Utterwood who has come to visit after running off with her husband years earlier; also, we have their respective husbands Hector and Randall, and probably the protagonist of the play Ellie Dunn, a friend of Hesione’s who’s keen on marrying a rich, old man, but which Hesione is against. This play is eventful. There’s always something happening. Emotions are high and characters treat each other with brutal honesty. Hearts break, one after another, as secrets are unveiled, but the story continues as hearts are mended just as quickly. I was awe-struck by Shaw’s excellent dialogues and intricately woven plot which promises high drama from the first page to the last. The social commentaries, the arguments about morality, the insights into human relationships – and all of them carried out with such acute, brutal, and soul-shaking honesty – beckons to the greatness of Shaw’s understanding of the society and the humans that form them and his genius of bringing that understanding with so much life and rigor on the page. One of the best books I’ve read this year!

Rating: 5/5 *****


202- Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett

While usually I feel a bit unsure and restrictive when purchasing books for my personal use, having the external objective, on this occasion, of preparing for the exams spoiled me to shop left and right for every book that I could find off of the syllabus – without any hesitation whatsoever. And it paid off. I got my hands on Shaw’s plays, Emerson’s essays, and most rewardingly, I finally found Beckett’s play ‘Waiting for Godot’, which I had anticipated of buying/reading for a long time. Reading the play itself, however, was a completely bizarre experience. But what was I expecting anyways from this absurdist play? Perhaps the TED-Ed video which so attractively pitches this play for readers to read led me to have contradictory expectations of enjoying the play despite its grim and frustrating plot. A tragicomedy in two acts, this play is about two characters waiting at a crossroad beside a tree, for someone who never shows up: Godot. A play where, literally, nothing ever happens; or as the famous review of the play by Irish Times stated, ‘where nothing happens twice (meaning in both acts)’. I didn’t enjoy reading this play it all. The fascination I had for reading this play turned to frustration and exhaustion as I began reading it. But here is the irony of this play: the deserved and much acclaimed importance of this play isn’t because it presents the life or the mood of the post-WW2 world in any hopeful, elevated, or signifying way – but rather that it captures so candidly the absurdity of life and existence which had becomes threateningly clear after the second war. Yet the reason this play continues to resonate with readers is that even when the world isn’t at war, life, in existential terms, doesn’t stop being absurd – man and life, as it seems, are always at odds. And so while I definitely didn’t enjoy reading this play as a whole, I also haven’t enjoyed living my life as a whole - and that resonation of this play to my life, and to human lives in general, is what makes this play so irresistibly significant.

Rating: 4/5 ****

 

203- The Caretaker by Harold Pinter

This was out of the left field for me. I had never heard of Pinter or any of his works. He isn’t, I presume, mentioned in the contemporary conversations among the bookish people either. This explains the academic nature of this syllabus that I am preparing from, which I rather welcome for whatever I have read so far has been based either on my instincts or recommendations that I have gathered from the conversations about books. More academic content of literature, therefore, was a much-needed element for me to get an education from. Pinter’s revolves around three characters, two young men who might be brothers and an old man whom they give shelter and later offer him the job of the ‘caretaker’. Although this play didn’t strike me as anything significant from the reading of it, I nonetheless quite enjoyed the dialogues between the young folks who own a shelter and an older person who is in need of one. This created a tension where the old man at times felt a certain humiliation, which wasn’t intended from the young fellas, but due to his direly hapless situation the old man had to but oblige to his cruel circumstances. I am sure that much like Beckett’s play, Pinter’s ‘The Caretaker’ must have some far-reaching and deeper meaning to its otherwise plain and simple plot, for which I am yet to read the literary explanations of the play. On the whole, however, this was one of the plays that I just enjoyed reading without having had to go through the excitements or frustrations.

Rating: 3/5 ***

 

204- Pygmalion by G.B. Shaw

I was lucky to have to get and read two of Shaw’s play, for if ‘Heartbreak House’ was one of his best work, ‘Pygmalion’ was definitely his most acclaimed. The plot, which is about an ill-mannered, flower-selling girl incredible transformation into this delicately speaking, fine, high-class lady after a couple of intentionally bachelor men, one famous linguist and one retired colonel, take her on as a challenge and train her for six-months, and the motives of the plot, mainly being a satire on the bourgeoise society, are what immediately and attractively makes for a great recipe for a famous play. Shaw’s providence on this promising plot with his witty, piercing, moving, and sharp prose and dialogues does the rest to make this play, probably, his best-known play, if not his best. While ‘Pygmalion’ is certainly an entertaining read and thoroughly enjoyable, to me it seemed a little less ‘packed’ and thrilling than ‘Heartbreak House’, which was full of surprises and high drama. The challenge taken on the two men to transform this unruly girl into a fine lady is definitely inviting enough, however, the way this challenge fulfills itself isn’t as dramatic or ‘challenging’. As soon as the bet is on, in the next act we immediately see the first glimpses of Lizzie’s transformed self – having skipped the juicy and spicy part of the training itself. The tension which is felt between Lizzie and her misogynistic teacher both prior to and after the training is quite well formed as it provides a tantalizing friction. Especially when Lizzie becomes this fine-speaking lady and her values change similarly, she then begins to oppose Higgin’s cruel and objectifying behavior towards her with new found rigor and confidence. As for Higgins, he is shocked at his own doing. The play ends rather abruptly and is then followed by a long epilogue from Shaw commentating on how things played out further and what it meant. The friction between Lizzie and Higgins which later advances into a blown-out conflict does make for a kind of opposing, uninitiated, and brimming ‘romance’ which is the subtitle of this play. However, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that at its heart this play is also, and more intentionally, a satire. But one consensus is easy to arrive at, and that is that this play, as by the standards of Shaw, is definitely an entertaining and thought-provoking read.

Rating: 4/5 **** October 29, 2021_